On 17 Nov 2015, at 21:22, Stewart, David C wrote:
> On 11/17/15, 10:40 AM, "Python-Dev on behalf of R. David Murray"
> rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote:
>>
>> I suppose that for this to have maximum effect someone would have to
>> specifically be paying attention to performance and figuring out why
Stewart, David C writes:
> Note: PGO is not the default way to build Python because it is
> relatively slow to compile it that way. (I think it should be the
> default).
+1
Slow-build-fast-run should be the default if you're sure the
optimization works. Only developers are likely to run a gi
Hi Python community,
Thank you for your feedback! We will look into this and come up with an e-mail
format proposal in the following days.
Best regards,
--
Stefan A. POPA
Software Engineering Manager
System Technologies and Optimization Division
Software Services Group, Intel Romania
> On 17 N
+Stefan (owner of the 0-day lab)
On 11/17/15, 10:40 AM, "Python-Dev on behalf of R. David Murray"
wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:37:06 +, "Stewart, David C"
> wrote:
>> Last June we started publishing a daily performance report of the latest
>> Python tip against the previous day's run
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:37:06 +, "Stewart, David C"
wrote:
> Last June we started publishing a daily performance report of the latest
> Python tip against the previous day's run and some established synch point.
> We mail these to the community to act as a "canary in the coal mine." I wrote
Last June we started publishing a daily performance report of the latest Python
tip against the previous day's run and some established synch point. We mail
these to the community to act as a "canary in the coal mine." I wrote about it
at https://01.org/lp/blog/0-day-challenge-what-pulse-interne
Brett,
Very cool, I'm glad to see that Jython's performance was competitive under
most of these benchmarks. I would also be interested in joining the
proposed mailing list.
re elementtree - I assume the benchmarking is usually done with
cElementTree. However Jython currently lacks a Java equivale
On 16/11/2015 22:23, Zachary Ware wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015, Brett Cannon wrote:
Hi Brett
Any thoughts on improving the benchmark set (I think all of
{cpython,pypy,pyston} introduced new benchmarks to the set).
We should pr
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Monday, November 16, 2015, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Brett
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on improving the benchmark set (I think all of
>>> {cpython,pypy,pyston} introduced new benchmarks to the set).
>>
>>
>> We should probably start a maili
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 at 12:24 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> Hi Brett
>
> Any thoughts on improving the benchmark set (I think all of
> {cpython,pypy,pyston} introduced new benchmarks to the set).
>
We should probably start a mailing list and finally hash out a common set
of benchmarks that we all a
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:23:49 +0100, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> Any thoughts on improving the benchmark set (I think all of
> {cpython,pypy,pyston} introduced new benchmarks to the set).
> "speed.python.org" becoming a thing is generally stopped on "noone
> cares enough to set it up".
Actually, w
Hi Brett
Any thoughts on improving the benchmark set (I think all of
{cpython,pypy,pyston} introduced new benchmarks to the set).
"speed.python.org" becoming a thing is generally stopped on "noone
cares enough to set it up".
Cheers,
fijal
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:40 AM Catalin G. Manciu <
catalin.gabriel.man...@intel.com>
[SNIP -- stuff came back as visible HTML; hopefully I didn't miss something]
>
>
> Thank you for your feedback! We value the community’s input and we would
> like to provide the most relevant results in our autom
Brett Cannon python.org> writes:
>
>
> Should we discuss of these are the benchmarks we want daily reports on
(you can see what the benchmark suite has at
https://hg.python.org/benchmarks/file/2979f5ce6a0c/perf.py#l2243 )? I
personally would prefer dropping pybench and replacing it with a st
Hi,
I don't know if it's related but at EuroPython at saw a new website
which can also help:
http://pybenchmarks.org/
Victor
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mai
Should we discuss of these are the benchmarks we want daily reports on (you
can see what the benchmark suite has at
https://hg.python.org/benchmarks/file/2979f5ce6a0c/perf.py#l2243 )? I
personally would prefer dropping pybench and replacing it with a startup
measurement.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015, 07:2
On 24 July 2015 at 23:55, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> On 24.07.15 15:34, lp_benchmark_robot wrote:
>> The community's feedback is very important for us. For any questions,
>> comments or suggestions you can also contact us on our mailing list
>> l...@lists.01.org. You can also check our website: htt
On 24.07.15 15:34, lp_benchmark_robot wrote:
Hi Internals,
This is the first message from Intel's language optimization team.
We would like to provide the Python internals developer community
with a daily service which will monitor latest committed patches
performance regressions against well kn
Oops, I wanted to send the patch to myself, not to the python-dev
mailing list, sorry :-)
(It's a set of patch to try to optimize the tracemalloc module.)
Victor
2013/9/18 Victor Stinner :
>
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mai
19 matches
Mail list logo
