On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:05, Steven Bethard
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
>> wrote:
>> > I noticed that the newly added argparse module has an unusual
>> > licence header, included below. This is the on
> Yes, I have signed a contributor agreement. I was thinking of just
> removing the license entirely, but if it's better to replace it with
> "Licensed to PSF under a Contributor Agreement", that's fine too. Let
> me know, and I'll take care of this today.
Technically, your *contribution* should h
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:05, Steven Bethard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
> wrote:
> > I noticed that the newly added argparse module has an unusual
> > licence header, included below. This is the only file in the Python tree
> > that contains an explicit refere
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
wrote:
> I noticed that the newly added argparse module has an unusual
> licence header, included below. This is the only file in the Python tree
> that contains an explicit reference to the Apache License,
> and this leads me to some questions
