On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:40 PM, "Martin v. Löwis"
> wrote:
>> There are, apparently, still callers of the nb_long slot, so I would be
>> cautious.
>
> We should remove all usage of it and rename it to nb_reserved.
I see uses of nb_lo
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:40 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> I noticed that the builtin numeric types (int, float, complex) all still
>> have a __long__ method in 3.x. Shouldn't this have disappeared as
>> part of the int/long unification? Is there any reason not to remove this
>> (by setting t
> I noticed that the builtin numeric types (int, float, complex) all still
> have a __long__ method in 3.x. Shouldn't this have disappeared as
> part of the int/long unification? Is there any reason not to remove this
> (by setting the nb_long entry to 0 in all three cases)?
There are, apparentl
