On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 14:08, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Thomas Wouters
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestions (Antoine too), but that's not really the
> topic I
> > want to discuss here (but if you guys move to Google I'll happily discuss
> > all the stuff we
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I do want to support it; that's why we put the facilities you found
> there in the first place. Unfortunately nobody actually did the
> necessary second step of trying to bundle the stdlib and trying to
> make the tests pass. So I think it
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Thomas Wouters wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions (Antoine too), but that's not really the topic I
> want to discuss here (but if you guys move to Google I'll happily discuss
> all the stuff we have to deal with.) The questions is really whether Python
> wants to
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 22:16, PJ Eby wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Wouters wrote:
>
>> (And, yes, I'm zipping up the stdlib for Python 2.7 at Google, to reduce
>> the impact on the aforementioned million of machines :)
>>
>
> You might want to consider instead backporting the
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Wouters wrote:
> (And, yes, I'm zipping up the stdlib for Python 2.7 at Google, to reduce
> the impact on the aforementioned million of machines :)
>
You might want to consider instead backporting the importlib caching
facility, since it provides some of t
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:49:24 -0800
Thomas Wouters wrote:
> Also, depending on what else you
> want to put in the zipfile, you may have to be aware of zipimports limited
> implementation of zipfiles that involve various 32k-filecount and
> 2Gb-filesize limits. (And in case you're wondering, yes, we
