Guido van Rossum wrote:
> This looks good. Please make the appropriate changes to the PEP and to
> PEP 0 to mark it as accepted.
I should get to that in the next day or two. Thanks.
> I think the implementation is fine too (others will have to check it
> more carefully) but I noticed that the pro
This looks good. Please make the appropriate changes to the PEP and to
PEP 0 to mark it as accepted.
I think the implementation is fine too (others will have to check it
more carefully) but I noticed that the promised functionality of -m
doesn't work yet: I created a file Lib/test/foo.py whose sol
