On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 2:30 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
>> Is this still an open question, Terry?
>
>
> It is not currently for #9974 because after consideration of two proposed
> patches (one part of another issue), I decided that the conditions being
> guarde
On Feb 18, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> While the function could be implemented as one 70-line function, it happens
> to be implemented as a 4-line wrapper for a completely undocumented
> (Untokenizer class with 4 methods. (It is unmentioned in the doc and there
> are currently no d
On 3/31/2014 2:30 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
I am working through the multiple bugs afflicting tokenize.untokenize, which
is described in the tokenize doc and has an even longer docstring. While the
function could be implemented as one 70-line funct
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> I am working through the multiple bugs afflicting tokenize.untokenize, which
> is described in the tokenize doc and has an even longer docstring. While the
> function could be implemented as one 70-line function, it happens to be
> implemented
