On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:41:23 -, "Gregory P. Smith" wrote:
> I *believe* you can get this to happen today in a review if you add the
> rep...@bugs.python.org email address to the code review as the issueX
> in the subject line will make the tracker turn it into a bug comment. If
> so, hav
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:09 PM Terry Reedy wrote:
> Gmail dumps patch review email in my junk box. The problem seems to be
> the spoofed From: header.
>
> Received: from psf.upfronthosting.co.za ([2a01:4f8:131:2480::3])
> by mx.google.com with ESMTP id
> m1si26039166wjy.52.2015.05.12.00
On Fri, 22 May 2015 08:05:49 +0300, Antti Haapala wrote:
> There's an issue about this at
> http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue562
>
> I believe the problem is not that of the SPF, but the fact that mail gets
> sent using IPv6 from an address that has neither a name mapping to it n
There's an issue about this at
http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue562
I believe the problem is not that of the SPF, but the fact that mail gets
sent using IPv6 from an address that has neither a name mapping to it nor a
reverse pointer from IP address to name in DNS. See the second-
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:15 AM, David Wilson wrote:
> SPF only covers the envelope sender, so it should be possible to set
> that to something that validates with SPF, keep the RFC822 From: header
> as it is, and maybe(?) include a separate Sender: header matching the
> envelope address.
As Came
On 12May2015 22:15, David Wilson wrote:
SPF only covers the envelope sender, so it should be possible to set
that to something that validates with SPF, keep the RFC822 From: header
as it is, and maybe(?) include a separate Sender: header matching the
envelope address.
David
Indeed. That sound
SPF only covers the envelope sender, so it should be possible to set
that to something that validates with SPF, keep the RFC822 From: header
as it is, and maybe(?) include a separate Sender: header matching the
envelope address.
David
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:08:30PM -0400, Terry Reedy wrote: