On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:03 PM, scott mc wrote:
> I built 2.7 on Haiku, but am getting failures in the regression tests.
> Many of them are in math related tests, failing in the 15th decimal
> place on test_decimal and a few others like that, I posted a ticket on
> Haiku's trac for that as it m
The config.guess/.sub files in python/trunk/Modules/_ctypes/libffi are
from , which is just before Haiku was finally added to the offical
versions from gnulib.
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=config.git;a=blob_plain;f=config.guess;hb=HEAD
and
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=config.git;
> I don't see such a commitment in this case, but if a
> believable one comes up I'm sure Martin would happily revert his
> position.
Indeed. I have myself added support for AtheOS, even though I had
never used the system. The AtheOS maintainer ran away, the code
rotted, and eventually get ripped
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
wrote:
> -On [20090115 16:53], Guido van Rossum (gu...@python.org) wrote:
>>Did you look at the patch they submitted? http://bugs.python.org/issue4933
>
> I did now (python-2.5.4-haiku-2.diff). I am not sure what you are implying
> tho
-On [20090115 16:53], Guido van Rossum (gu...@python.org) wrote:
>Did you look at the patch they submitted? http://bugs.python.org/issue4933
I did now (python-2.5.4-haiku-2.diff). I am not sure what you are implying
though, Guido. It doesn't look like a huge change and most of it is close to
'one
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> actively working on POSIX compliance. My only guess right now is that this
> work is largely complete. In effect that would mean that Python would work
> out of the box, more or less. So the cost of adding and maintaining it in
This is very interesting to kno
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
wrote:
> -On [20090115 01:11], Guido van Rossum (gu...@python.org) wrote:
>>I'm with Martin. In these days of distributed version control systems,
>>I would think that the effort for the Haiku folks to maintain a branch
>>of Python in
-On [20090115 01:11], Guido van Rossum (gu...@python.org) wrote:
>I'm with Martin. In these days of distributed version control systems,
>I would think that the effort for the Haiku folks to maintain a branch
>of Python in their own version control would be minimal. It is likely
>that for each new
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I'm with Martin. In these days of distributed version control systems,
> I would think that the effort for the Haiku folks to maintain a branch
> of Python in their own version control would be minimal. It is likely
> that for each new Pyt
I'm with Martin. In these days of distributed version control systems,
I would think that the effort for the Haiku folks to maintain a branch
of Python in their own version control would be minimal. It is likely
that for each new Python version that comes out, initially it is
broken on Haiku, and t
Raymond> The theory is that we don't want to support minority operation
Raymond> systems. My view is that we should support those systems to
Raymond> the extent that someone like the OP is willing to maintain the
Raymond> handful of deltas needed to get all tests to pass (the OP's
11 matches
Mail list logo
