There are non-stable buildbots that are failing consistently, but this
message is about something else. Now that the biggest stability
issues have been addressed some less-noisy stability issues are visible.
The two that I have noticed most often are test_httpsservers, which
hangs occasionally, a
Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
>> Yes, I think this just started happening. I'm guessing that the main
>> site proxies the buildbot URL requests to the buildbot master process,
>> and when it's down you get the 404s from the main server.
>>
>> I figured someone might be working on the master, though per
> Yes, I think this just started happening. I'm guessing that the main
> site proxies the buildbot URL requests to the buildbot master process,
> and when it's down you get the 404s from the main server.
>
> I figured someone might be working on the master, though perhaps it
> just burped on its o
"R. David Murray" writes:
> The buildbot pages appear to be pretty messed up now. I get many 404s
> (ex: the above url, the all stable builders page), although some seem to
> work (ex: the all builders page), and if I stick an 'all' into the URL
> for my buildbot page I can get to it, though tha
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 at 00:09, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Martin v. L??wis v.loewis.de> writes:
The buildbots still show occasional oddities. For example, right now in
the page "http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/3.x/";, some results have
disappeared (the columns for "AMD64 Ubuntu" builders have be
Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
>
> > The buildbots still show occasional oddities. For example, right now in
> > the page "http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/3.x/";, some results have
> > disappeared (the columns for "AMD64 Ubuntu" builders have become empty).
>
> Yes, I noticed it too.
>> The buildbot waterfall is much greener now. Thanks to all who have
>> contributed to making it so (and it hasn't just been Mark and Antoine
>> and I, though we've been the most directly active (and yes, Mark, you
>> did contribute several fixes!)).
>
> The buildbots still show occasional oddit
Le Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:53:27 -0500, R. David Murray a écrit :
> The buildbot waterfall is much greener now. Thanks to all who have
> contributed to making it so (and it hasn't just been Mark and Antoine
> and I, though we've been the most directly active (and yes, Mark, you
> did contribute sever
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> I'd just like to say thanks again to everyone for making the buildbots
> more green and also improving the general testing infrastructure for
> Python.
I'm *really* liking the new assertions in unittest.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 3:53 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>
>> (2) issue 4970: consistent signal 32 error on the norwitz-x86 Gentoo
>> buildslave in 3.1 and 3.x. This may be due to the box
>> running an old threading library,
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 at 19:44, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:
JFTR, I didn't set up the IRC bot (I assume that credit goes to Martin,
even if it's only one line in the buildbot config :). I just tried to
get it to say something :)
Yes, it was always "on". I don't use IRC regularly, so I don't know
whe
> JFTR, I didn't set up the IRC bot (I assume that credit goes to Martin,
> even if it's only one line in the buildbot config :). I just tried to
> get it to say something :)
Yes, it was always "on". I don't use IRC regularly, so I don't know
whether it's useful.
Regards,
Martin
On Nov 6, 2009, at 6:34 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
R. David Murray schrieb:
So, overall I think the buildbot fleet is in good shape, and if
we can nail issue 6748 I think it will be back to being an
important resource for sanity checking our checkins.
Yay! Thanks to all of you!
Indeed! It's
R. David Murray schrieb:
> The buildbot waterfall is much greener now. Thanks to all who have
> contributed to making it so (and it hasn't just been Mark and Antoine
> and I, though we've been the most directly active (and yes, Mark, you
> did contribute several fixes!)).
[...]
> In the 'unstable'
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 3:53 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> (1) issue 3864: FreeBSD testing hangs consistently. According to the
> ticket this is a FreeBSD bug fixed in 6.4, so an OS upgrade
> on the buildslave would probably solve it.
I think the particular issue mentioned in 386
15 matches
Mail list logo
