On Jan 29, 2008 11:34 AM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [GvR]
> > I don't see why. __index__ has a slot because its
> > primary use is to be called from C code, where slots
> > add a slight performance advantage.
> > __trunc__ doesn't get called from C AFAIK.
>
> I thought the __tr
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> [GvR]
>> I don't see why. __index__ has a slot because its
>> primary use is to be called from C code, where slots
>> add a slight performance advantage.
>> __trunc__ doesn't get called from C AFAIK.
>
> I thought the __trunc__ method only gets called from
> the C cod
[GvR]
> I don't see why. __index__ has a slot because its
> primary use is to be called from C code, where slots
> add a slight performance advantage.
> __trunc__ doesn't get called from C AFAIK.
I thought the __trunc__ method only gets called from
the C code for the trunc() function which is c
I don't see why. __index__ has a slot because its primary use is to be
called from C code, where slots add a slight performance advantage.
__trunc__ doesn't get called from C AFAIK.
On Jan 29, 2008 11:04 AM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should the implementation of __trunc__ have
