On 14 November 2013 01:43, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Nick Coghlan writes:
>
> > The long gory history in http://bugs.python.org/issue7475 took a
> > different turn earlier this year when I noticed
> > (http://bugs.python.org/issue7475#msg187698) that the codecs module
> > already *had* type
On 13.11.2013 15:29, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Back in Python 3.2, the non-Unicode codecs were restored to the
> standard library, but without the associated aliases (mostly due to
> some thoroughly confusing error messages when they were mistakenly
> used with the Unicode encoding convenience methods)
