-On [20080413 19:59], "Martin v. Löwis" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Making suggestions on the list, and then following up with patch,
>is certainly encouraged, and happens all the time.
Here you go.
>I just think that *this* specific proposed change is more effort to
>talk about than it's worth.
Brett Cannon schrieb:
>> +0. If we ever run out of letters for command line options to have
>> to collect -J, we have deeper problems than having to coordinate
>> with Jython whether the letter is still available.
>
> +0
Shall I remove the reservation of -J again?
Christian
> > > > Isn't that bikeshedding?
> > >
> > > No. I think "implementation-specific" is definitely more accurate,
> > > and I was hoping the suggestion might get an immediate "good idea,
> > > implemented", from somebody already looking at that code.
> >
> > It's already committed, so one
"Martin v. Löwis" writes:
> > > > How about "-X is reserved for implementation-specific arguments"?
> >
> > > Isn't that bikeshedding?
> >
> > No. I think "implementation-specific" is definitely more accurate,
> > and I was hoping the suggestion might get an immediate "good idea,
> > im
> > > How about "-X is reserved for implementation-specific arguments"?
>
> > Isn't that bikeshedding?
>
> No. I think "implementation-specific" is definitely more accurate,
> and I was hoping the suggestion might get an immediate "good idea,
> implemented", from somebody already looking at th
"Martin v. Löwis" writes:
> > How about "-X is reserved for implementation-specific arguments"?
> Isn't that bikeshedding?
No. I think "implementation-specific" is definitely more accurate,
and I was hoping the suggestion might get an immediate "good idea,
implemented", from somebody already
> How about "-X is reserved for implementation-specific arguments"? Ie,
> I suppose that the intent is not that these arguments won't be
> standardized, it's that they be standardized by the affected
> implementations.
Isn't that bikeshedding?
Regards,
Martin
Frank Wierzbicki writes:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was also going to suggest a platform independent option. I like
> > -Xwhat-follows-is-impl-dependent.
> This would work just fine for us, and it makes sense to have it
> available for al
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:08 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Great, thanks! While I'd love to have *both* -X and -J, is that okay
> > with the other devs?
>
> +0. If we ever run out of letters for command line options to have
> to collect -J, we have deeper problems than ha
> Great, thanks! While I'd love to have *both* -X and -J, is that okay
> with the other devs?
+0. If we ever run out of letters for command line options to have
to collect -J, we have deeper problems than having to coordinate
with Jython whether the letter is still available.
Regards,
Martin
___
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Cannon schrieb:
>
> >> -X is reserved for non-standard arguments
> >
> > Fine by me.
>
> And implemented in r62293 (trunk)
Great, thanks! While I'd love to have *both* -X and -J, is that okay
with the other d
Brett Cannon schrieb:
>> -X is reserved for non-standard arguments
>
> Fine by me.
And implemented in r62293 (trunk)
Christian
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://m
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Frank Wierzbicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was also going to suggest a platform independent option. I like
> > -Xwhat-follows-is-impl-dependent.
> This would work just fine for us
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was also going to suggest a platform independent option. I like
> -Xwhat-follows-is-impl-dependent.
This would work just fine for us, and it makes sense to have it
available for all implementations. If everyone likes th
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank
> Wierzbicki
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 12:14 PM
> To: Brett Cannon
> Cc: Guido van Rossum; python-dev@python.org
> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Reserving an arg space
Frank Wierzbicki wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Works for me. We should have a patch to CPython that looks for -J and
>>>
>> > rejects it w
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Reserving an arg space for Jython
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Works for me. We should have a patch to CPython that looks
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Works for me. We should have a patch to CPython that looks for -J and
> > rejects it with "-J is reserved for Jython".
> >
>
> Do we want
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Works for me. We should have a patch to CPython that looks for -J and
> rejects it with "-J is reserved for Jython".
>
Do we want it to be Jython-specific, or should it be available to any
alternative VM? I don't know
Patch is here: http://bugs.python.org/issue2617
-Frank
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Works for me. We should have a patch to CPython that looks for -J and
> rejects it with "-J is reserved for Jython".
Great! Knowing this crowd it is probably already implemented -- but
if not I'd love to dust off my C
Works for me. We should have a patch to CPython that looks for -J and
rejects it with "-J is reserved for Jython".
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Frank Wierzbicki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if it might be possible for Jython to get an "arg
> space" for command li
22 matches
Mail list logo
