On 12/08/2010 12:56, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello,
I would like to see “unit test needed” removed from the workflow menu in
the bug tracker. The reason is that we don't do test-driven development
(or, at least, most of us don't) and this stage entry is therefore
useless and confusing. Saying to s
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:02:29 -0400
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
>
> I remember there was an idea somewhere to replace "patch" tag with a
> check-list with boxes for code, tests, and docs. I think that would
> be better than "unit test needed" stage.
To me the simpler the better. If there's a pat
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Fred Drake wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Alexander Belopolsky
> wrote:
>> I remember there was an idea somewhere to replace "patch" tag with a
>> check-list with boxes for code, tests, and docs. I think that would
>> be better than "unit test needed"
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
> I remember there was an idea somewhere to replace "patch" tag with a
> check-list with boxes for code, tests, and docs. I think that would
> be better than "unit test needed" stage.
Are you suggesting check boxes for what's needed,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
..
>> I would like to see “unit test needed” removed from the workflow menu in
>> the bug tracker.
..
> Is that stage supposed to (at least partly) capture the idea
> 'reproducible tes
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to see “unit test needed” removed from the workflow menu in
> the bug tracker. The reason is that we don't do test-driven development
> (or, at least, most of us don't) and this stage entry is therefore
> useless a
