Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>So the two things I thought were glitches are actually cancelling each
>>other out. Very good. Thanks for your help.
>
>
> Though I wonder why it was written so delicately.
Don't know; Jeremy wrote those functions back in 2001 to add nested scopes. If
he remembers he
> So the two things I thought were glitches are actually cancelling each
> other out. Very good. Thanks for your help.
Though I wonder why it was written so delicately. Would explicit
INCREF/DECREF really have hurt the performance that much? This is only
the bytecode compiler, which isn't on the
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 18:59 -0700, Brett C. wrote:
> So no leak. Yes, there should be more explicit refcounting to be proper, but
> the compiler cheats in a couple of places for various reasons. But basically
> everything is fine since st->st_cur and st->st_stack are only played with
> refcount-w
Matthew F. Barnes wrote:
> Someone on python-help suggested that I forward this question to
> python-dev.
>
> I've been studying Python's core compiler and bytecode interpreter as a
> model for my own interpreted language,
Might want to take a peek at the AST branch in CVS; that is what the compi
