On Sunday 03 April 2005 16:48, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> If this kind of functionality would fall on immediate rejection for
> some reason, even writing the PEP might be pointless.
Note that even if something is rejected, the PEP itself is useful - it
collects knowledge in a format that's far more
Greetings,
> If this kind of functionality would fall on immediate rejection for
> some reason, even writing the PEP might be pointless. If the
[...]
In my opinion the functionality is useful.
> I personally think that the proposed functionality should *not* live
> in a separate module, but some
At 08:48 AM 4/3/05 +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I personally think that the proposed functionality should *not* live
in a separate module, but somehow be integrated into SRE.
+1.
Whether or
not the proposed functionality is useful in the first place, I don't
know. I never have nested named group
Josiah Carlson wrote:
re2 can be used as a limited structural parser. This makes the re
module useful for more things than it is currently. The question of it
being in the standard library, however, I think should be made based on
the criteria used previously (whatever they were).
In general, if d
Nicolas Fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> import re2
> buf='12 drummers drumming, 11 pipers piping, 10 lords a-leaping'
> regex='^((?P(?P\d+) (?P[^,]+))(, )?)*$'
> pat2=re2.compile(regex)
> x=pat2.extract(buf)
If one wanted to match the API of t
