On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 11:40:27AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Perhaps you could focus in 728278. It addresses some of the issues you
> have addressed in 754022, but it is not properly formatted. If you could
> merge into your patch the result of "set(728278)-set(754022)", it would
> be grea
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 11:40:27AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Perhaps you could focus in 728278. It addresses some of the issues you
> have addressed in 754022, but it is not properly formatted.
I started to look at it yesterday, but it's so big and does so many
things at once... it requ
>I am in game, as one of those patches is mine. I've started to review
> patches...
Hi Oleg,
Perhaps you could focus in 728278. It addresses some of the issues you
have addressed in 754022, but it is not properly formatted. If you could
merge into your patch the result of "set(728278)-set(75
> On Friday 18 March 2005 17:44, Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
> > Additionally, there are several patches on SF that pertain to
> > webbrowser.py; perhaps you can review some of them...
By all means. Done!
> Given the time I haven't been able to devote to the webbrowser module, a
> consolidated
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 06:55:09PM -0500, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2005 17:44, Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
> > Additionally, there are several patches on SF that pertain to
> > webbrowser.py; perhaps you can review some of them...
>
> Given the time I haven't been able to de
On Friday 18 March 2005 17:44, Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
> Additionally, there are several patches on SF that pertain to
> webbrowser.py; perhaps you can review some of them...
Given the time I haven't been able to devote to the webbrowser module, a
consolidated set of reviews would be very he
