On 5/20/2019 4:09 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
>
> IMHO your remarks are not directly related to the PEP 587 and can be
> addressed in parallel.
>
>> It sounds like PyOxidizer and Hermetic Python are on the same page and
>> we're working towards a more official solution. But I want to
Hi Gregory,
IMHO your remarks are not directly related to the PEP 587 and can be
addressed in parallel.
> It sounds like PyOxidizer and Hermetic Python are on the same page and
> we're working towards a more official solution. But I want to make sure
> by explicitly stating what PyOxidizer is doi
On 5/16/2019 10:25 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 16:10, Thomas Wouters a écrit :
>>> Would you be ok with a "PyConfig_Init(PyConfig *config);" function
>>> which would initialize all fields to theire default values? Maybe
>>> PyConfig_INIT should be renamed to PyConfig_STATIC_I
Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 16:10, Thomas Wouters a écrit :
>> Would you be ok with a "PyConfig_Init(PyConfig *config);" function
>> which would initialize all fields to theire default values? Maybe
>> PyConfig_INIT should be renamed to PyConfig_STATIC_INIT.
>>
>> You can find a similar API for pthread
On 16May2019 0710, Thomas Wouters wrote:
A couple of things are documented as performing pre-initialisation
(PyConfig_SetBytesString, PyConfig_SetBytesArgv). I understand why, but
I feel like that might be confusing and error-prone. Would it not be
better to have them fail if pre-initialisation
On 15May2019 1610, Victor Stinner wrote:
Thanks to the constructive discussions, I enhanced my PEP 587. I don't
plan any further change, the PEP is now ready to review (and maybe
even for pronouncement, hi Thomas! :-)).
My view is that while this is a fantastic PEP and the groundwork that
alre
Thanks for adding your input, Gregory! It's much appreciated.
I'll shuffle your comments around a bit, as I'd rather address the
themes than each individual point.
On 15May2019 2134, Gregory Szorc wrote:
PyPreConfig_INIT and PyConfig_INIT as macros that return a struct feel
weird to me. Speci
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:03 PM Victor Stinner wrote:
> (Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 06:34, Gregory Szorc a
> écrit :
> > > I know that the PEP is long, but well, it's a complex topic, and I
> > > chose to add many examples to make the API easier to understand.
> >
> > I saw your request for feedback
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 13:05, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > PyPreConfig_INIT and PyConfig_INIT as macros that return a struct feel
> > weird to me. Specifically, the `PyPreConfig preconfig =
> > PyPreConfig_INIT;` pattern doesn't feel right. I'm sort of OK with these
> > being implemented as macros. B
(Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 06:34, Gregory Szorc a écrit :
> > I know that the PEP is long, but well, it's a complex topic, and I
> > chose to add many examples to make the API easier to understand.
>
> I saw your request for feedback on Twitter a few days back and found
> this thread.
>
> This PEP is
On 5/15/2019 4:10 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to the constructive discussions, I enhanced my PEP 587. I don't
> plan any further change, the PEP is now ready to review (and maybe
> even for pronouncement, hi Thomas! :-)).
>
> The Rationale now better explains all challenges and the
11 matches
Mail list logo
