Fred L. Drake, Jr. schrieb:
> On Sunday 30 July 2006 15:44, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > if isinstance(obj, ClassType) or isinstance(obj, type(type))
>
> Looks like you've got a possible name clash in the second isinstance. ;-)
Nah, that's rather an entry to the obfuscated Python contest.
The two oc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 30, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> On Sunday 30 July 2006 16:17, Georg Brandl wrote:
>> The second "type" seems to be superfluous. ;)
>
> I was thinking it suggested there was a local named "type". But if
> not, yeah.
>
> I ge
On Sunday 30 July 2006 16:17, Georg Brandl wrote:
> The second "type" seems to be superfluous. ;)
I was thinking it suggested there was a local named "type". But if not, yeah.
I get the impression Barry's pretty new to this "Python thing." Wonder what
he's been up to. ;-)
-Fred
--
Fred
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> if isinstance(obj, ClassType)
>
> which fails in Python 2.5. I actually rewrote it like so:
>
> if isinstance(obj, ClassType) or isinstance(obj, type(type))
The second "type" seems to be superfluous. ;)
Georg
___
Python-Dev ma
On Sunday 30 July 2006 15:44, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> if isinstance(obj, ClassType) or isinstance(obj, type(type))
Looks like you've got a possible name clash in the second isinstance. ;-)
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Re: Python 2.5 compatibility
On Jul 28, 2006, at 8:57 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> +1. It would give me more type to port and test a few of my
> applications to the new version.
>
> I'm still working on Mailman but the most painful thing so far has
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> Anthony and I talked about still having b3 on Aug 1. rc1 around Aug
> 17-18 (just before the Google sprint which Martin, Jeremy and I will
> be attending). Final around 24-29. We didn't discuss with Martin
> yet, so these dates are quite tentative.
That doesn't work for me
Neal Norwitz wrote:
>Anthony and I talked about still having b3 on Aug 1. rc1 around Aug
>17-18 (just before the Google sprint which Martin, Jeremy and I will
>be attending). Final around 24-29. We didn't discuss with Martin
>yet, so these dates are quite tentative.
>
>
If it doesn't muck-up
On 7/28/06, Michael Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Does anyone disagree with making the next release beta3?
>
> It seems like a good idea to me. I guess this will mean the final
> release will be pushed back a bit?
Anthony and I talked about s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 28, 2006, at 1:39 AM, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> I've been thinking the same thing, too. A quick chat to Neal says that
> he also agrees.
>
> There's still a lot more bugs popping up than I'm really comfortable
> with. I guess this is inevitable -
Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 28 July 2006 15:32, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>> I suggest that there be a third beta release and that we then wait
>> just a bit before going final.
>>
>> The bugs that were found and fixed in the first two beta releases
>> suggest that Py2.5
On Friday 28 July 2006 15:32, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> I suggest that there be a third beta release and that we then wait
> just a bit before going final.
>
> The bugs that were found and fixed in the first two beta releases
> suggest that Py2.5 is not yet as stable as we would like. Over the
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
