On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Antoine Pitrou
> wrote:
> >> I agree with Serhiy, but that is probably known at this point. :)
> >
> > I agree with Serhiy and you too. Clinic's current output makes C files
> > more tedious to read, and I'm
06.01.14 22:53, Erik Bray написав(ла):
I ask because some built-in functions are used internally by other
built-in functions. I don't know how common this is but, for example,
fileio_read calls fileio_readall. So if fileio_readall is renamed to
io_FileIO_readall_impl or whatever we need to also
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 00:25:53 +0100
> Stefan Krah wrote:
>> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> > > I had that working at one point. Guido said no, keep it all in one file.
>> > > I'm flexible but first you'd have to convince him.
>> >
>> > It's also no
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
> Now, properly converting a function to work with Argument Clinic does not
> change its behavior. Internally, the code performing argument parsing
> should be nigh-identical; it should call the same PyArg_Parse function, with
> the same argu
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> I agree with Serhiy, but that is probably known at this point. :)
>
> I agree with Serhiy and you too. Clinic's current output makes C files
> more tedious to read, and I'm not really willing to participate in the
> "conversion derby" becaus
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 00:25:53 +0100
Stefan Krah wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > > I had that working at one point. Guido said no, keep it all in one file.
> > > I'm flexible but first you'd have to convince him.
> >
> > It's also not something we're stuck with forever - we can start with it
>
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > I had that working at one point. Guido said no, keep it all in one file.
> > I'm flexible but first you'd have to convince him.
>
> It's also not something we're stuck with forever - we can start with it inline
> (which has the advantage of keeping all the code in the sa
On 6 Jan 2014 05:54, "Larry Hastings" wrote:
>
> On 01/05/2014 01:49 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>>
>> But I very much upset by the fact that the generated code is written
mixed with written manually. It is difficult to navigate (list of symbols
now contains three times more names), makes it diffi
On 01/05/2014 01:49 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
But I very much upset by the fact that the generated code is written
mixed with written manually. It is difficult to navigate (list of
symbols now contains three times more names), makes it difficult to
read and provokes error (editing the generat
It looks interesting enough. I volunteer to convert at least the
audioop, grp, operator, pwd, spw, sre, struct, tkinter modules (audioop
already converted, tkinter in progress). If no one will get them, I
perhaps will convert the builtins, sys, itertools, functools modules and
str, bytes, byte
On 01/05/2014 11:49 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/5/2014 11:21 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
By my estimate, there are about six hundred places that could be
converted
to work with Argument Clinic in CPython; as of this writing only a
dozen or
two have actually been converted.
Do you remember which?
On 1/5/2014 11:21 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
Let me start with a summary of the current status of Argument Clinic.
It's checked in, it seems to be working fine. As of Friday I've checked
in some reasonably complete documentation as a howto:
http://docs.python.org/3.4/howto/clinic.html
At
12 matches
Mail list logo
