Vinay Sajip wrote:
> When I check it in I will elaborate on the class docstring to explain the
> usage
> in a bit more detail, as well as of course detailing it in the docs in a
> separate section entitled "Passing contextual information to the log" (or
> similar).
Thanks, I understand what you m
Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
> It looks pretty good (and useful) to me, but I have a couple of questions.
>
> When you talk about stacking in the constructor docstring, do you mean
> something like having LoggerAdapterA delegating to LoggerAdapterB which
> in turn delegates to the real logg
Vinay Sajip at Red Dove wrote:
> One solution is to create a generic wrapper around loggers to which a logger
> name and contextual information can be passed. The wrapper would delegate
> logging calls to the logger with the specified name, but would manipulate
> the arguments passed to the logging
