On 24 February 2017 at 20:21, Cory Benfield wrote:
>
> Either way, I think I’d like to confirm this works by writing two more
> modules. First, I’d like to actually write most of the tls module into
> something that can live on PyPI, in no small part because backporting it
> would be useful for t
> On 24 Feb 2017, at 09:55, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> Heh, I guess you must have already caught everyone with a strong opinion
> about this by way of security-sig :)
So it seems. =D
> On the procedural front, the main open question is whether or not Guido wants
> to review and approve this PEP
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:55:20 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> On the procedural front, the main open question is whether or not Guido
> wants to review and approve this PEP himself, or if he'd prefer to delegate
> that task.
>
> Assuming the latter case, I think it may make sense for Christian to h
On 14 February 2017 at 00:26, Cory Benfield wrote:
> All,
>
> Python has never exposed the ability to use TLS backends other than
> OpenSSL in the standard library. As Christian and I discussed back at the
> Developer Summit at PyCon US 2016, the ssl module would more properly be
> called the ope
