Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 451 (ModuleSpec) has landed

2013-11-22 Thread Brett Cannon
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Eric Snow wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Eric Snow > wrote: > > The bulk of PEP 451 (all but the "fluffy" parts as Brett called them > > ) is now committed to default. > > I'm looking into buildbot failures (on Windows of course). .. which have now b

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 451 (ModuleSpec) has landed

2013-11-22 Thread Eric Snow
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Eric Snow wrote: > The bulk of PEP 451 (all but the "fluffy" parts as Brett called them > ) is now committed to default. I'm looking into buildbot failures (on Windows of course). -eric ___ Python-Dev mailing list Pytho

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 451 (ModuleSpec) is accepted

2013-11-08 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 9 Nov 2013 06:39, "Brett Cannon" wrote: > > I just want to publicly thank Eric for his hard work on this PEP. I think Nick, Eric, and myself all came to the same conclusion independently about needing to update the APIs used by import to make them more flexible and able to grow in the future, b

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 451 (ModuleSpec) is accepted

2013-11-08 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 08, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Eric Snow wrote: >I'm pleased to announce that Brett Cannon and Nick Coghlan (the >co-BDFL-delegates) have accepted PEP 451 for inclusion in Python 3.4. >Both of them have contributed substantially to the discussions of the >proposal and have helped make it solid. I'

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 451 (ModuleSpec) is accepted

2013-11-08 Thread Ethan Furman
On 11/08/2013 11:49 AM, Eric Snow wrote: I'm pleased to announce that Brett Cannon and Nick Coghlan (the co-BDFL-delegates) have accepted PEP 451 for inclusion in Python 3.4. Excellent! Congrats, and thanks to everyone who worked on it. -- ~Ethan~ _

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 451 (ModuleSpec) is accepted

2013-11-08 Thread Guido van Rossum
Congrats are deserved all around. This is a solid PEP. I'm glad you all took such great care with the design and the review. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/list

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 451 (ModuleSpec) is accepted

2013-11-08 Thread Brett Cannon
I just want to publicly thank Eric for his hard work on this PEP. I think Nick, Eric, and myself all came to the same conclusion independently about needing to update the APIs used by import to make them more flexible and able to grow in the future, but Eric is the one that took the time to champio

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 451 (ModuleSpec) is accepted

2013-11-08 Thread Victor Stinner
Oh congrats Eric for your PEP. I like it. Victor Le vendredi 8 novembre 2013, Eric Snow a écrit : > I'm pleased to announce that Brett Cannon and Nick Coghlan (the > co-BDFL-delegates) have accepted PEP 451 for inclusion in Python 3.4. > Both of them have contributed substantially to the discuss

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 451: ModuleSpec

2013-10-20 Thread Guido van Rossum
How about if Brett and Nick both agree that it's good, I approve it? If either one wants more discussion I'll appoint them the PEP-BDFL. On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Eric Snow wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Eric Snow > wrote: >> Any comments? Usually silence implies no disapprov

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 451: ModuleSpec

2013-10-20 Thread Eric Snow
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Eric Snow wrote: > Any comments? Usually silence implies no disapproval. ;) PEP 451 did > go through several rounds of review on import-sig, so I'm not going to > stress over low feedback at this point. However, I'd particularly > appreciate knowing if there are

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 451: ModuleSpec

2013-10-11 Thread Eric Snow
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Eric Snow wrote: > After a few rounds on import-sig PEP 451 is really for general > consumption. I also have a patch up now. > > HTML: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0451/ > implementation: http://bugs.python.org/issue18864 > > Your comments would be appreciat

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 451: ModuleSpec

2013-10-07 Thread Eric Snow
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > As a quick remark, reading the word "name" made me think a couple of times > whether it's the simple name of the module or the fully qualified name. I > think it's the FQMN in pretty much all cases, but it would be good to make > that clear, m

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 451: ModuleSpec

2013-10-05 Thread Stefan Behnel
Eric Snow, 05.10.2013 07:18: > After a few rounds on import-sig PEP 451 is really for general > consumption. I also have a patch up now. > > HTML: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0451/ > implementation: http://bugs.python.org/issue18864 Thanks, I'm happy that this is moving forward. > Your