On 7 Apr 2015 03:43, "Neil Girdhar" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Following up with PEP 448, I've gone over the entire code review except
a few points as mentioned at the issue: http://bugs.python.org/review/2292/.
I'm hoping that this will get done at the PyCon sprints. Is there any way
I can help?
>
>
Hello,
Following up with PEP 448, I've gone over the entire code review except a
few points as mentioned at the issue: http://bugs.python.org/review/2292/.
I'm hoping that this will get done at the PyCon sprints. Is there any way
I can help?
I couldn't make it to PyCon, but I do live in Montrea
On 17 March 2015 at 23:49, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:11 PM Neil Girdhar wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I was wondering what is left with the PEP 448
>> (http://bugs.python.org/issue2292) code review? Big thanks to Benjamin,
>> Ethan, and Serhiy for reviewing some (all?
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:11 PM Neil Girdhar wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was wondering what is left with the PEP 448 (
> http://bugs.python.org/issue2292) code review? Big thanks to Benjamin,
> Ethan, and Serhiy for reviewing some (all?) of the code. What is the next
> step of this process?
>
Hi everyone,
I was wondering what is left with the PEP 448 (
http://bugs.python.org/issue2292) code review? Big thanks to Benjamin,
Ethan, and Serhiy for reviewing some (all?) of the code. What is the next
step of this process?
Thanks,
Neil
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Neil Girdhar wrote
Anyone have time to do a code review?
http://bugs.python.org/issue2292
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Neil Girdhar wrote:
> It's from five days ago. I asked Joshua to take a look at something, but
> I guess he is busy.
>
> Best,
>
> Neil
>
> —
>
> The latest file there is from Feb 26, while y
It's from five days ago. I asked Joshua to take a look at something, but I
guess he is busy.
Best,
Neil
—
The latest file there is from Feb 26, while your message that the patch was
ready for review is from today -- so is the
patch from five days ago the most recent?
--
~Ethan~
On Mon, Mar
On 03/02/2015 12:18 PM, Neil Girdhar wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> Le lundi 2 mars 2015, Neil Girdhar a écrit :
>>>
>>> The patch is ready for review now, and I should have time this week to
>>> make changes and respond to comments.
>>
>> Where is the patch?
>
http://bugs.python.org/issue2292
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Where is the patch?
>
> Victor
>
> Le lundi 2 mars 2015, Neil Girdhar a écrit :
>
> Hi everyone,
>>
>> The patch is ready for review now, and I should have time this week to
>> make changes and respond to c
Where is the patch?
Victor
Le lundi 2 mars 2015, Neil Girdhar a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> The patch is ready for review now, and I should have time this week to
> make changes and respond to comments.
>
> Best,
>
> Neil
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Guido van Rossum > wrote:
>
>> I'm b
Hi everyone,
The patch is ready for review now, and I should have time this week to make
changes and respond to comments.
Best,
Neil
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I'm back, I've re-read the PEP, and I've re-read the long thread with "(no
> subject)".
>
> I think G
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 02/26/2015 12:19 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > As a follow-up, Joshua updated the PEP to remove *comprehensions, and it
> is now accepted.
>
> Congratulations Thomas, Joshua, and Neil!!
>
Wot, me? No, no, all credit goes to Joshua an
On 27 Feb 2015 07:12, "Brett Cannon" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:38 PM Ethan Furman wrote:
>>
>> On 02/26/2015 12:19 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>> > As a follow-up, Joshua updated the PEP to remove *comprehensions, and
it is now accepted.
>>
>> Congratulations Thomas, Joshua, and
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:38 PM Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 02/26/2015 12:19 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > As a follow-up, Joshua updated the PEP to remove *comprehensions, and it
> is now accepted.
>
> Congratulations Thomas, Joshua, and Neil!!
>
I'll add a "thanks" to everyone involved with t
On 02/26/2015 12:19 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> As a follow-up, Joshua updated the PEP to remove *comprehensions, and it is
> now accepted.
Congratulations Thomas, Joshua, and Neil!!
--
~Ethan~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
One more thing. This PEP would never have been accepted without a working
implementation. Thanks Neil and Joshua for that! (And for being flexible.)
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> As a follow-up, Joshua updated the PEP to remove *comprehensions, and it
> is now accep
As a follow-up, Joshua updated the PEP to remove *comprehensions, and it is
now accepted.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I'm back, I've re-read the PEP, and I've re-read the long thread with "(no
> subject)".
>
> I think Georg Brandl nailed it:
>
> """
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
