On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 20/11/2013 22:01, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>>
>> pathlib imports many modules at startup, so for scripts for which
>> startup time is critical using os.path may still be the best option.
>>
>>
> Will there be or is there a note to this effe
On Nov 20, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> When pathlib-in-the-stdlib stabilizes, I plan to release a pathlib 1.0
> on PyPI that will integrate the PEP's API.
Great, thanks!
Chris
> In the meantime, if you don't mind installing from VCS, you clone the
> Mercurial repo (https://bi
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 01:51:59 +0100
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:43:26 -0800
> Chris Barker wrote:
> >
> > By the way, for us dinosaurs is this going to exactly match the
> > pathlib implementation that can be used with py2?
>
> pathlib up to 0.8 (on PyPI) has a different API
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:43:26 -0800
Chris Barker wrote:
>
> By the way, for us dinosaurs is this going to exactly match the
> pathlib implementation that can be used with py2?
pathlib up to 0.8 (on PyPI) has a different API - since there were so
many changes done as part of the release process.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' wrote:
> Isn't this redundant?
>
> >>> Path.cwd()
> PosixPath('/home/antoine/pathlib')
>
> Probably this is just personal taste but I'd prefer the more explicit:
>
> >>> Path(os.getcwd())
> PosixPath('/home/antoine/pathlib')
>
> I understand all t
On 20/11/2013 22:01, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
pathlib imports many modules at startup, so for scripts for which
startup time is critical using os.path may still be the best option.
Will there be or is there a note to this effect in the docs?
--
Python is the second best programming language in
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 13:42:42 -0800
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> > Guido has told me that he was ready to approve PEP 428 (pathlib) in its
> > latest amended form. Here is the last call for any comments or
> > arguments against approval, be
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 13:42:42 -0800
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> > Guido has told me that he was ready to approve PEP 428 (pathlib) in its
> > latest amended form. Here is the last call for any comments or
> > arguments against approval, be
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Guido has told me that he was ready to approve PEP 428 (pathlib) in its
> latest amended form. Here is the last call for any comments or
> arguments against approval, before Guido marks the PEP accepted (or
> changes his mind :-)).
>
Cong
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Guido has told me that he was ready to approve PEP 428 (pathlib) in its
> latest amended form. Here is the last call for any comments or
> arguments against approval, before Guido marks the PEP accepted (or
> changes his mind
Am 20.11.13 17:04, schrieb Eric V. Smith:
> I think the confusion comes from the difference between what NTFS can do
> and what the Win32 (or whatever it's now called) layer allows you to do.
> Rumor has it that the old Posix subsystem allowed NTFS to create 2 files
> in the same directory that dif
On 2013-11-20, at 17:09 , Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 11/20/2013 04:25 AM, Garth Bushell wrote:
>
> I'm also quite uneasy on the case insensitive comparison on Windows as the
> File system NTFS is case sensitive.
>
> No, it's case-preser
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 11/20/2013 04:25 AM, Garth Bushell wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm also quite uneasy on the case insensitive comparison on Windows as
>> the File system NTFS is case sensitive.
>>
>
> No, it's case-preserving.
>
It's quite possible that you are both r
On 11/20/2013 09:01 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 11/20/2013 04:25 AM, Garth Bushell wrote:
>>
>> I'm also quite uneasy on the case insensitive comparison on Windows as
>> the File system NTFS is case sensitive.
>
> No, it's case-preserving.
>
>> """Current Windows file systems, like NTFS, are cas
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:25:20 +
> Garth Bushell wrote:
> >
> > I'm also quite uneasy on the case insensitive comparison on Windows as
> the
> > File system NTFS is case sensitive.
> >
> > """Current Windows file systems, like NTFS, are
On 11/20/2013 04:25 AM, Garth Bushell wrote:
I'm also quite uneasy on the case insensitive comparison on Windows as the File
system NTFS is case sensitive.
No, it's case-preserving.
"""Current Windows file systems, like NTFS, are case-sensitive; that is a
readme.txt and a Readme.txt can ex
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:25:20 +
Garth Bushell wrote:
>
> I'm also quite uneasy on the case insensitive comparison on Windows as the
> File system NTFS is case sensitive.
>
> """Current Windows file systems, like NTFS, are case-sensitive; that is a
> readme.txt and a Readme.txt can exist in th
I've noticed in pathlib.py the following error on line 39
if sys.getwindowsversion()[:2] >= (6, 0) and sys.version_info >= (3, 2):
it should be:-
if sys.getwindowsversion()[2:] >= (6, 0) and sys.version_info >= (3, 2):
I'm also quite uneasy on the case insensitive comparison on Windows as the
F
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:02:15 -0500
Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Guido has told me that he was ready to approve PEP 428 (pathlib) in its
> > latest amended form. Here is the last call for any comments or
> > arguments again
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Guido has told me that he was ready to approve PEP 428 (pathlib) in its
> latest amended form. Here is the last call for any comments or
> arguments against approval, before Guido marks the PEP accepted (or
> changes his mind
20 matches
Mail list logo
