Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 (pathlib) now committed

2013-11-24 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 24 Nov 2013 01:21, "Antoine Pitrou" wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 15:32:58 +0200 > Serhiy Storchaka wrote: > > 22.11.13 18:44, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла): > > > I've pushed pathlib to the repository. I'm hopeful there won't be > > > new buildbot failures because of it, but still, there may be

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 (pathlib) now committed

2013-11-23 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 15:32:58 +0200 Serhiy Storchaka wrote: > 22.11.13 18:44, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла): > > I've pushed pathlib to the repository. I'm hopeful there won't be > > new buildbot failures because of it, but still, there may be some > > platform-specific issues I'm unaware of. > > Con

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 (pathlib) now committed

2013-11-23 Thread anatoly techtonik
I'd vote for a different perspective on path handling. For me the pathlib is not the good way to go. Especially with copying ill behaviour of old os.path functions. We definitely need a "task force page" dedicated to "working with paths in Python" to collaborate. ML + PEP with privileged write acc

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 (pathlib) now committed

2013-11-23 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
22.11.13 18:44, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла): I've pushed pathlib to the repository. I'm hopeful there won't be new buildbot failures because of it, but still, there may be some platform-specific issues I'm unaware of. Congratuate Antoine! Does it means that issues #11344 (Add os.path.splitpath(

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 (pathlib) now committed

2013-11-22 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:44:55 +0100 Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > I've pushed pathlib to the repository. I'm hopeful there won't be > new buildbot failures because of it, but still, there may be some > platform-specific issues I'm unaware of. Actually, there turn out to be two platform-specific issue

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 (pathlib) now committed

2013-11-22 Thread anatoly techtonik
It was too fast. I didn't had a chance to send the comments. -- anatoly t. On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Hello, > > I've pushed pathlib to the repository. I'm hopeful there won't be > new buildbot failures because of it, but still, there may be some > platform-specif

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 428 (pathlib) now committed

2013-11-22 Thread Victor Stinner
2013/11/22 Antoine Pitrou : > I've pushed pathlib to the repository. I'm hopeful there won't be > new buildbot failures because of it, but still, there may be some > platform-specific issues I'm unaware of. A PEP wouldn't be successful if it doesn't break any buildbot. PEP 451 was successful, as y