Big +1.
Indeed, this whole Ellipsis approach is just an awful hack.
-
Yury
On 2012-02-26, at 8:30 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> PEP: 415
> Title: Implementing PEP 409 differently
> Version: $Revision$
> Last-Modified: $Date$
> Author: Benjamin Peterson
> Status: Draft
> Type: Standards Track
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2012/2/27 Ethan Furman :
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2012/2/26 Nick Coghlan :
Thanks for writing that up. I'd be amenable if the PEP was clearly
updated to say that ``raise exc from cause`` would change from being
syntactic sugar for ``_hidden = exc; _hidden.__cause__ = c
2012/2/27 Ethan Furman :
> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>>
>> 2012/2/26 Nick Coghlan :
>>>
>>> Thanks for writing that up. I'd be amenable if the PEP was clearly
>>> updated to say that ``raise exc from cause`` would change from being
>>> syntactic sugar for ``_hidden = exc; _hidden.__cause__ = cause;
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2012/2/26 Nick Coghlan :
Thanks for writing that up. I'd be amenable if the PEP was clearly
updated to say that ``raise exc from cause`` would change from being
syntactic sugar for ``_hidden = exc; _hidden.__cause__ = cause; raise
exc`` (as it is now) to ``_hidden = exc;
2012/2/26 Nick Coghlan :
> Thanks for writing that up. I'd be amenable if the PEP was clearly
> updated to say that ``raise exc from cause`` would change from being
> syntactic sugar for ``_hidden = exc; _hidden.__cause__ = cause; raise
> exc`` (as it is now) to ``_hidden = exc; _hidden.__cause__ =
Thanks for writing that up. I'd be amenable if the PEP was clearly
updated to say that ``raise exc from cause`` would change from being
syntactic sugar for ``_hidden = exc; _hidden.__cause__ = cause; raise
exc`` (as it is now) to ``_hidden = exc; _hidden.__cause__ = cause;
_hidden.__suppress_contex
