Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 385: Auditing

2010-02-14 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes: > > Georg Brandl wrote: > > Am 13.02.2010 13:19, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > >> Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes: > >>> Alterntively, the email notification sent to python-checkins could could > >>> report who the pusher was. > >> This sounds reasonable, as

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 385: Auditing

2010-02-14 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Georg Brandl wrote: > Am 13.02.2010 13:19, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: >> Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes: >>> Alterntively, the email notification sent to python-checkins could could >>> report who the pusher was. >> This sounds reasonable, assuming it doesn't disclose any private information. >

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 385: Auditing

2010-02-14 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 13.02.2010 18:52, schrieb Dirkjan Ochtman: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:53, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> Dirkjan: if you agree to such a strategy, please mention that in the PEP. > > Having a pushlog and/or including the pusher in the email sounds like > a good idea, I'll add something to that

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 385: Auditing

2010-02-14 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 13.02.2010 13:19, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes: >> >> Alterntively, the email notification sent to python-checkins could could >> report who the pusher was. > > This sounds reasonable, assuming it doesn't disclose any private information. How could it disclos

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 385: Auditing

2010-02-13 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:53, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Dirkjan: if you agree to such a strategy, please mention that in the PEP. Having a pushlog and/or including the pusher in the email sounds like a good idea, I'll add something to that effect to the PEP. I slightly prefer adding it to the c

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 385: Auditing

2010-02-13 Thread Rafael Villar Burke (Pachi)
On 13/02/2010 16:03, Rafael Villar Burke (Pachi) wrote: There's some more content here: http://hg.mozilla.org/users/bsmedberg_mozilla.com/hgpoller/file/tip But I don't use it myself, just knew about its existance. Surely Dirkjan can make all the pieces fit nicely :). The hook code looks like it'

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 385: Auditing

2010-02-13 Thread Rafael Villar Burke (Pachi)
On 13/02/2010 15:25, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: Mozilla's pushlog can be seen here: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml And its code is avaliable here: http://hg.mozilla.org/users/bsmedberg_mozilla.com/hgpoller/file/tip/pushlog-feed.py Dirkjan is its author, so I suppose he was a

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 385: Auditing

2010-02-13 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Mozilla's pushlog can be seen here: > > http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml > > And its code is avaliable here: > http://hg.mozilla.org/users/bsmedberg_mozilla.com/hgpoller/file/tip/pushlog-feed.py > > Dirkjan is its author, so I suppose he was already thinking about having a > s

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 385: Auditing

2010-02-13 Thread Rafael Villar Burke
Antoine Pitrou pitrou.net> writes: > > Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes: > > > > Alterntively, the email notification sent to python-checkins could could > > report who the pusher was. > > This sounds reasonable, assuming it doesn't disclose any private information. There are already made

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 385: Auditing

2010-02-13 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes: > > Alterntively, the email notification sent to python-checkins could could > report who the pusher was. This sounds reasonable, assuming it doesn't disclose any private information. Regards Antoine. ___ Python