On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:15 AM, James Y Knight wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2010, at 8:58 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> The http read only URLs
> didn't work (no diff returned, just "svn: OPTIONS of
> 'http://svn.python.org/python/branches/pep-0384': 200 OK
> (http://svn.python.org)"),
>
> That was the w
Am 29.11.2010 09:36, schrieb Georg Brandl:
> Am 29.11.2010 09:09, schrieb "Martin v. Löwis":
>>> I have now completed
>>>
>>> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0384/
>>>
>>>
>>> was structseq.h considered?
>>
>> No, it wasn't - unfortunately, it still doesn't get included when
>> including
Am 29.11.2010 14:14, schrieb Éric Araujo:
> Hello,
>
>> Please comment with any changes you want to see, or speak in
>> favor or against this PEP.
>
> How to get a diff between py3k and this branch?
As others have already explained:
svn diff http://svn.python.org/projects/python/branches/p...@8
> This is probably an issue independent of the PEP but there appear to
> be a *lot* of exposed typedefs for various type slots and other
> function signatures that don't start with the Py prefix (i.e. getter,
> setter, unaryfunc and friends).
It's indeed independent: the names don't actually affec
> Extensions built with Py_LIMITED_API have the python version encoded in
> it's name. Which abi name should be used for these extensions?
PEP 3149, IIUC, says it should be "abi3". I don't understand what that
means, though (with respect to, say, distutils)
> - The m and u modifiers in the abi
2010/11/29 "Martin v. Löwis" :
>>> - Should the distutils support for LIMITED_API be part of the pep, or
>>> be implemented later?
>>
>> In any case, it has to be implemented in Distutils2, not in Distutils.
>> Distutils is frozen and just in maintenance mode.
>
> I think it's too late for that.
>> - Should the distutils support for LIMITED_API be part of the pep, or
>> be implemented later?
>
> In any case, it has to be implemented in Distutils2, not in Distutils.
> Distutils is frozen and just in maintenance mode.
I think it's too late for that. PEP 3149 is accepted, and it does
spe
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 29.11.2010 00:40, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>
>> I have now completed
>>
>> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0384/
>>
>> Benjamin has volunteered to rule on this PEP.
>>
>> Please comment with any changes you want to see, or speak in
>
On Nov 29, 2010, at 8:58 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> The http read only URLs
> didn't work (no diff returned, just "svn: OPTIONS of
> 'http://svn.python.org/python/branches/pep-0384': 200 OK
> (http://svn.python.org)"),
That was the wrong url: you should've used
http://svn.python.org/projects/py
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:40 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I have now completed
>
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0384/
>
> Benjamin has volunteered to rule on this PEP.
>
> Please comment with any changes you want to see, or speak in
> favor or against this PEP.
This is probably an issue i
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 29.11.2010 14:14, Éric Araujo wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> Please comment with any changes you want to see, or speak in
>>> favor or against this PEP.
>>
>> How to get a diff between py3k and this branch?
>
> I used
> svn diff svn://svn.py
On 29.11.2010 14:14, Éric Araujo wrote:
Hello,
Please comment with any changes you want to see, or speak in
favor or against this PEP.
How to get a diff between py3k and this branch?
I used
svn diff svn://svn.python.org/python/branches/p...@84330
svn://svn.python.org/python/branches/pep-03
Hello,
> Please comment with any changes you want to see, or speak in
> favor or against this PEP.
How to get a diff between py3k and this branch?
Regards
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
On 29.11.2010 00:40, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
I have now completed
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0384/
Benjamin has volunteered to rule on this PEP.
Please comment with any changes you want to see, or speak in
favor or against this PEP.
I looked at a diff with r84330 from the py3k branc
Am 29.11.2010 09:09, schrieb "Martin v. Löwis":
>> I have now completed
>>
>> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0384/
>>
>>
>> was structseq.h considered?
>
> No, it wasn't - unfortunately, it still doesn't get included when
> including Python.h. I'll add it.
Would 3.2 be a good time
> I have now completed
>
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0384/
>
>
> was structseq.h considered?
No, it wasn't - unfortunately, it still doesn't get included when
including Python.h. I'll add it.
> IMO it could be made PEP384-compliant with two additions that would
> replace two n
2010/11/29 "Martin v. Löwis"
> I have now completed
>
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0384/
was structseq.h considered?
IMO it could be made PEP384-compliant with two additions that would replace
two non-compliant functions:
- A new function to create types, since PyStructSequence_InitTyp
On 11/28/2010 6:40 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
I have now completed
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0384/
The current text contains several error messages like:
"System Message: WARNING/2 (pep-0384.txt, line 194)
Bullet list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent."
Terry Jan Reed
18 matches
Mail list logo
