Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 382 specification and implementation complete

Am 06.11.2011 16:38, schrieb PJ Eby: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Nick Coghlan > wrote: > > I think this was based on the assumption that *existing* namespace > package approaches would break under the new scheme. Since that is not > the case, I suspect

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 382 specification and implementation complete

> I think this was based on the assumption that *existing* namespace > package approaches would break under the new scheme. Since that is not > the case, I suspect those previous objections were overstated (and all > packaging related code manages to cope well enough with modules where > the file n

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 382 specification and implementation complete

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > I think this was based on the assumption that *existing* namespace > package approaches would break under the new scheme. Since that is not > the case, I suspect those previous objections were overstated (and all > packaging related code manag

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 382 specification and implementation complete

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:10 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > I had announced this to import-sig already; now python-dev. > > I have now written an implementation of PEP 382, and fixed some details > of the PEP in the process. The implementation is available at > > http://hg.python.org/features/pep-3