I keep forgetting to reply to the list:
This is great news. I was getting ready to submit a patch to fix the
Unicode handling in simplejson (which I will probably do anyway), but
I'm interested in making sure whichever lib will hit the standard
library has a correct implementation.
Doug
O
> Possible features for 2.6
> New modules in the standard library:
> - JSON implementation
>
Have there been any plans made for which one? All of the
implementations I'm aware of (cjson, simplejson, jsonlib, demjson,
python-json) have serious issues that in my opinion should be fixed
be
-On [20080318 01:52], Barry Warsaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>This schedule gives everybody plenty of advanced notice, so you should be
>able to get your code in on time.
In particular the memory related fixes over the last weeks, please. :)
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai
イェルーン ラウ
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Greetings from Pycon 2008!
>
> Neal Norwitz and I have worked out the schedule for Python 2.6 and 3.0,
> which will be released in lockstep. We will be following a monthly
> release schedule, with releases to occur on the first Wednesday of the
> month. We'll move to a 2
