Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-20 Thread Guido van Rossum
[Guido] > > Here's a bunch of commentary: [Ping] > Thanks. Sorry it's taken me a couple of days to get back to this. > I think i'm caught up on the mail now. No problem! > > Also, in that same example, according to your specs, the TypeError > > raised by bar() has the ZeroDivisionError raised

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-20 Thread Walter Dörwald
Michael Hudson wrote: > Walter Dörwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>Ka-Ping Yee wrote: >> >>>[...] >>>(a) ban string exceptions >>>(b) require all exceptions to derive from Exception >>>(c) ban bare "except:" >>>(d) eliminate sys.exc_* >> >>I think somewhere in this list should

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-20 Thread Michael Hudson
Walter Dörwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > >> [...] >> (a) ban string exceptions >> (b) require all exceptions to derive from Exception >> (c) ban bare "except:" >> (d) eliminate sys.exc_* > > I think somewhere in this list should be: > >(?) Remove st

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-20 Thread Walter Dörwald
Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > [...] > (a) ban string exceptions > (b) require all exceptions to derive from Exception > (c) ban bare "except:" > (d) eliminate sys.exc_* I think somewhere in this list should be: (?) Remove string exceptions from the Python stdlib and perhaps:

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-20 Thread Ka-Ping Yee
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Here's a bunch of commentary: Thanks. Sorry it's taken me a couple of days to get back to this. I think i'm caught up on the mail now. > You're not giving enough credit to Java, which has the "cause" part > nailed IMO. You're right. I missed that.

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-19 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Monday 16 May 2005 22:41, Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0344.html | 2. Whenever an exception is raised, if the exception instance does | not already have a '__context__' attribute, the interpreter sets | it equal to the thread's exception context.

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-18 Thread Greg Ewing
Guido van Rossum wrote: > Here's another rule-of-thumb: when the VM and the user *share* the > attribute space of an object, the VM uses system attributes; the VM > uses plain attributes for objects that it owns completely (like code > objects, frames and so on, which rarely figure user code except

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-18 Thread Guido van Rossum
Here's another rule-of-thumb: when the VM and the user *share* the attribute space of an object, the VM uses system attributes; the VM uses plain attributes for objects that it owns completely (like code objects, frames and so on, which rarely figure user code except for the explicit purpose of int

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-17 Thread Greg Ewing
Guido van Rossum wrote: > Unfortunately I can't quite decide whether either rule applies in the > case of exceptions. I think you'd at least be justified in using the "magic" rule, since they're set by the exception machinery. Greg ___ Python-Dev mail

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-17 Thread Guido van Rossum
But that could easily be fixed by appending the context to the end of the chain, right? On 5/17/05, Eric Nieuwland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Consider > > > > try: > > BLOCK > > except EXCEPTION, VAR: > > HANDLER > > > > I'd like to see this tr

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-17 Thread Eric Nieuwland
Guido van Rossum wrote: > Consider > > try: > BLOCK > except EXCEPTION, VAR: > HANDLER > > I'd like to see this translated into > > try: > BLOCK > except EXCEPTION, VAR: > __context = VAR > try: > HANDLER > except Exception

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-17 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 07:41 AM 5/17/2005 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: >Consider > > try: > BLOCK > except EXCEPTION, VAR: > HANDLER > >I'd like to see this translated into > > try: > BLOCK > except EXCEPTION, VAR: > __context = VAR > try: > HANDLER

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-17 Thread Guido van Rossum
I figured out the semantics that I'd like to see intuitively for setting the context. I'm not saying this is all that reasonable, but I'd like throw it out anyway to see what responses it gets. Consider try: BLOCK except EXCEPTION, VAR: HANDLER I'd like to see this transl

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-17 Thread Guido van Rossum
[Guido van Rossum] > > My rule has more to do with who "owns" the namespace on the one hand, > > and with "magic" behavior caused (or indicated) by the presence of the > > attribute on the other. Class or instance is irrelevant; that most > > magic attributes live on classes or modules is just beca

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-17 Thread Aahz
On Mon, May 16, 2005, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > My rule has more to do with who "owns" the namespace on the one hand, > and with "magic" behavior caused (or indicated) by the presence of the > attribute on the other. Class or instance is irrelevant; that most > magic attributes live on classes or

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-16 Thread Guido van Rossum
[Jack Diederich] > I prefer trichomomies over dichotomies, but whether single or double > underscores are "the bad" or "the ugly" I'll leave to others. In python > double underscores can only mean "I don't handle this, my class does" or > "I'm a C++ weenie, can I pretend this is private?" > > Excl

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-16 Thread Jack Diederich
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 10:11:47PM -0400, Jack Diederich wrote: > The values are never shared by expections of the class ^^ s/expect/except/ Exceptions are expected by except statements - and ispell can't tell the difference. -jackdied ___

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-16 Thread Jack Diederich
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 08:09:54PM -0500, Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2005, Aahz wrote: > > I'll comment here in hopes of staving off responses from multiple > > people: I don't think these should be double-underscore attributes. The > > currently undocumented ``args`` attribute isn't doub

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-16 Thread Ka-Ping Yee
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Aahz wrote: > I'll comment here in hopes of staving off responses from multiple > people: I don't think these should be double-underscore attributes. The > currently undocumented ``args`` attribute isn't double-underscore, and I > think that's precedent to be followed. That i

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-16 Thread Brett C.
Guido van Rossum wrote: [SNIP - bunch of points from Guido] > Do we really need both __context__ and __cause__? Methinks that you > only ever need one: either you explicitly chain a new exception to a > cause, and then the context is probably the same or irrelevant, or you > don't explicitly chain

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-16 Thread Guido van Rossum
[Ka-Ping Yee] > This PEP is a concrete proposal for exception chaining, to follow > up on its mention here on Python-Dev last week as well as earlier > discussions in the past year or two. > > http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0344.html Here's a bunch of commentary: You're not giving enough cre

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 344: Exception Chaining and Embedded Tracebacks

2005-05-16 Thread Aahz
On Mon, May 16, 2005, Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > > This PEP is a concrete proposal for exception chaining, to follow > up on its mention here on Python-Dev last week as well as earlier > discussions in the past year or two. > > http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0344.html > > I've tried to summarize th