Andrew Koenig wrote:
>> PEP 343 has been updated on python.org.
>
>> Highlights of the changes:
>
>>- changed the name of the PEP to be simply "The 'with' Statement"
>
> Do you mean PEP 346, perchance? PEP 343 is something else entirely.
No, I mean PEP 343 - it describes Guido's proposal f
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 10/16/05, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope you reverted the status to "Proposed"...
I hadn't, but I've now fixed that in CVS (both in the PEP and the PEP index),
and added some text into the PEP saying why it was reverted to Draft.
> On the latter: I
> PEP 343 has been updated on python.org.
> Highlights of the changes:
>- changed the name of the PEP to be simply "The 'with' Statement"
Do you mean PEP 346, perchance? PEP 343 is something else entirely.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev
On 10/16/05, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PEP 343 has been updated on python.org.
>
> Highlights of the changes:
>
>- changed the name of the PEP to be simply "The 'with' Statement"
>- added __with__() method
>- added section on standard terminology (that is, contexts/conte
