On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:15:23PM +, Jp Calderone wrote:
> > I would like to see (optional?) support for this before your patch is
> > merged. I have a long-term interest in a Python-based service control /
> > init replacement / system management application, for use in specialised
> > envir
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, [ISO-8859-1] "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Philippe Biondi wrote:
> > I've done a small patch to use linux AF_NETLINK sockets (see below).
> > Please comment!
>
> I have a high-level comment - python-dev is normally the wrong place
> for patches; please submit them to sf.net/proj
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 01:32:52 +, David Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:17:49PM +0100, Philippe Biondi wrote:
>
> > I've done a small patch to use linux AF_NETLINK sockets (see below).
> > Please comment!
>
> As of 2.6.10, a very useful new netlink family was merge
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:54:42 +0100, "\"Martin v. Löwis\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Philippe Biondi wrote:
> > I've done a small patch to use linux AF_NETLINK sockets (see below).
> > Please comment!
>
> I have a high-level comment - python-dev is normally the wrong place
> for patches; please
Philippe Biondi wrote:
I've done a small patch to use linux AF_NETLINK sockets (see below).
Please comment!
I have a high-level comment - python-dev is normally the wrong place
for patches; please submit them to sf.net/projects/python instead.
Apart from that, the patch looks fine.
Is there a reaso
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:17:49PM +0100, Philippe Biondi wrote:
> I've done a small patch to use linux AF_NETLINK sockets (see below).
> Please comment!
As of 2.6.10, a very useful new netlink family was merged -
NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT. I'd imagine quite a lot of interest from Python
developers
