On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 at 03:23 Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> A number of public typedef names without the "Py" prefix survived the
> Grand Renaming [1]. A couple of new names without the "Py" prefix were
> added after the Grand Renaming (e.g. getter and setter [2]).
>
> That names were included in the
On 27.03.17 13:43, Victor Stinner wrote:
2017-03-27 12:22 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka :
Should we to do something with this? Maybe add Py-prefixed aliases and
temporary keep old names for compatibility (but allow to hide them if define
a special macro)?
Is is possible to keep backward compatibi
2017-03-27 12:22 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka :
> Should we to do something with this? Maybe add Py-prefixed aliases and
> temporary keep old names for compatibility (but allow to hide them if define
> a special macro)?
Is is possible to keep backward compatibility if an older version of
the stable