-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 9, 2008, at 7:28 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
As we approach the planned first betas for 2.6/3.0, my heart sinks
when I see the imposing list of 16 release blockers. [1] Luckily,
most
of the issues have patches that ju
I'll try to roll an updated patch with the review info tonight for you
On Jun 10, 2008, at 7:26 PM, "Benjamin Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 9, 2008, at 6:33
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Jun 9, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>
>> For the multiprocessing module all I have left is the docs in rest format
>> - given I'm a rest newbie, it's taking lon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 9, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
For the multiprocessing module all I have left is the docs in rest
format - given I'm a rest newbie, it's taking longer than I thought
It's okay if docs don't make it into the beta. That's the kind
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the multiprocessing module all I have left is the docs in rest format -
> given I'm a rest newbie, it's taking longer than I thought
If you want to email what you have done to [EMAIL PROTECTED], we'd love to help!
--
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
As we approach the planned first betas for 2.6/3.0, my heart sinks
when I see the imposing list of 16 release blockers. [1] Luckily, most
of the issues have patches that just need *your* review. Others,
namely the Py3k exception issues, may require a little more
discussio
For the multiprocessing module all I have left is the docs in rest
format - given I'm a rest newbie, it's taking longer than I thought
On Jun 8, 2008, at 7:38 PM, "Benjamin Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
As we approach the planned first betas for 2.6/3.0, my heart sinks
when I see th