Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> The style-guide in C is that macro names are spelled in all-caps, so
> if you see an all-caps identifier, you expect it to be a macro name.
Hi Martin.
OK, so somewhere we have:
/* NOARGS_NULL: A parameter declared in this way is present only because
* the function is r
K D schrieb:
> I thought it would be nice to have the code marked somehow so that it
> was obvious what the additional (and obviously unused) parameter was.
> The two references (NULL and METH_NOARGS) are both in upper-case and as
> C is a case-sensitive language I think it's probably usual to do
>
Thomas Wouters schrieb:
> My only objection (which is a minor one) is with the 'NOARGS_NULL' name.
> Caps don't fit the normal style rules, and 'noargs_null' doesn't make
> much sense to me. 'unused' strikes me as a clearer name (or
> 'noargs_unused' or 'args_unused' or such.)
The point clearly i
My only objection (which is a minor one) is with the 'NOARGS_NULL' name.
Caps don't fit the normal style rules, and 'noargs_null' doesn't make much
sense to me. 'unused' strikes me as a clearer name (or 'noargs_unused' or
'args_unused' or such.) It should be fine to fix this in 2.5 as well (as
lon
