On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:48, Éric Araujo wrote:
> Le 19/01/2011 18:04, Georg Brandl a écrit :
>> Am 19.01.2011 16:25, schrieb Eric Smith:
Bonus question: if we remove maintainers.rst from py3k, what do we do in
3.1 and 2.7? I’d favor removing them over keeping outdated versions.
>>>
>>
Le 19/01/2011 18:04, Georg Brandl a écrit :
> Am 19.01.2011 16:25, schrieb Eric Smith:
>>> Bonus question: if we remove maintainers.rst from py3k, what do we do in
>>> 3.1 and 2.7? I’d favor removing them over keeping outdated versions.
>>
>> Is there not some advantage to knowing who was the main
It's not in the svn tree; it's an Hg repo:
ssh://h...@hg.python.org/devguide . The link is also listed in the
Resources section of the devguide.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:59, wrote:
>
> Brett,
>
> I'm sure I just missed it, but where is the devguide in the Subversion tree?
>
> Thx,
>
> Skip
>
_
Brett,
I'm sure I just missed it, but where is the devguide in the Subversion tree?
Thx,
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/pyt
Short of moving README.coverity (I'm waiting to here back from the
company), I'm done with my tweaks to the directory.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 15:31, Brett Cannon wrote:
> OK, here is my plan that I will implement:
>
> MOVE
> --
> developers.txt
> maintainers.rst
> README.gdb
> README.cov
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 15:49, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:31:24 -0800
> Brett Cannon wrote:
>> OK, here is my plan that I will implement:
>>
>> MOVE
>> --
>> developers.txt
>> maintainers.rst
>> README.gdb
>> README.coverity
>> README.Emacs
>>
>> DELETE (seem way too o
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:31:24 -0800
Brett Cannon wrote:
> OK, here is my plan that I will implement:
>
> MOVE
> --
> developers.txt
> maintainers.rst
> README.gdb
> README.coverity
> README.Emacs
>
> DELETE (seem way too old to still be relevant; tell me if I am wrong)
> ---
> REA
OK, here is my plan that I will implement:
MOVE
--
developers.txt
maintainers.rst
README.gdb
README.coverity
README.Emacs
DELETE (seem way too old to still be relevant; tell me if I am wrong)
---
README.OpenBSD
README.AIX
cheatsheet
LEAVE everything else (with README properly edi
Am 19.01.2011 16:25, schrieb Eric Smith:
>> Bonus question: if we remove maintainers.rst from py3k, what do we do in
>> 3.1 and 2.7? I’d favor removing them over keeping outdated versions.
>
> Is there not some advantage to knowing who was the maintainer (or expert)
> of a given module at the t
> Bonus question: if we remove maintainers.rst from py3k, what do we do in
> 3.1 and 2.7? Iâd favor removing them over keeping outdated versions.
Is there not some advantage to knowing who was the maintainer (or expert)
of a given module at the time of a release?
Eric.
___
Le 17/01/2011 23:41, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> [...]
>> Also, I see no need to put the maintainers list in the dev guide,
>> actually.
>
> Every time I see someone syncing the version-independent maintainers
> list across branches a little
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I am not describing what is in Misc.
>
> It comes down to a question of whether any core dev-specific stuff
> should be in Misc that is not a configuration file or not. I say no,
> that the directory should contain stuff that applies to every
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 14:41, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>
>> Well it *is* inconvenient in the case of maintainers.rst, which is
>> often consulted casually for daily bug tracker work. Grepping
>> Misc/maintainers.rst is much easier than first h
On Jan 17, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>Wow, that Purify file is really old... Unless anyone can confirm it
>still works, maybe just toss it? Barry?
Wow indeed. The email address in there hasn't worked in, what? a decade? :)
Toss it!
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signa
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Well it *is* inconvenient in the case of maintainers.rst, which is
> often consulted casually for daily bug tracker work. Grepping
> Misc/maintainers.rst is much easier than first having to find again
> where your checkout of the devguide
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:32:20 -0800
Brett Cannon wrote:
> There is a bunch of stuff in Misc that probably belongs in the
> devguide (under Resources) instead of in svn. Here are the files I
> think can be moved (in order of how strongly I think they should be
> moved):
>
> PURIFY.README
> README.c
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> There is a bunch of stuff in Misc that probably belongs in the
> devguide (under Resources) instead of in svn. Here are the files I
> think can be moved (in order of how strongly I think they should be
> moved):
>
> PURIFY.README
> README.cov
Am 17.01.2011 21:32, schrieb Brett Cannon:
> There is a bunch of stuff in Misc that probably belongs in the
> devguide (under Resources) instead of in svn. Here are the files I
> think can be moved (in order of how strongly I think they should be
> moved):
>
> PURIFY.README
> README.coverty
> READ
18 matches
Mail list logo
