Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Things should be as simple as possible but no simpler. It's pretty
> clear to me that dropping __context__ approaches this ideal. I'm sorry
> I didn't push back harder when __context__ was first proposed -- in
> retrospect, the first 5 months of PEP 343's life, before __c
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I believe the context API design has gotten totally out of hand.
> I have a counter-proposal: let's drop __context__.
Heh. I was about to pull out the "if the implementation is hard to
explain, it's a bad idea (and bad ideas shouldn't go into 2.X)" rule
last week in resp
