On 7/2/05, Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like a better way to go is a Money package (or perhaps a Financial
> package) and just create the Currency module within it for now. Anyway,
Something to consider!
> given that this isn't going to be a real PEP any time soon, please
> restric
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005, Facundo Batista wrote:
> On 7/1/05, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> * Time value of money computations are typically dimensionless (not
>> sensitive to currency type or formatting) and they often have algorithm
>> specific rounding needs (round at the end o
On 7/1/05, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Facundo]
> > The pre-PEP is almost done, and the corresponding
> > test cases are all written.
>
> What is the part about the pre-PEP? Something like this probably
> shouldn't go in the standard library until it has been proven in the
>
[Facundo]
> The pre-PEP is almost done, and the corresponding
> test cases are all written.
What is the part about the pre-PEP? Something like this probably
shouldn't go in the standard library until it has been proven in the
field. This doubly true for a module that has made some unusual OO
des
