On 7/1/05, Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. Unfortunately, that's one big area where Python needs work;
> new-style classes are probably the worst. If you wanted to take the
> lead and push a sprint on doc work, you'd be a hero.
Ehhh... what a good idea for PyCon 2006!!
:D
.Facun
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005, Facundo Batista wrote:
> On 7/1/05, Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> My suspicion is that someone at some point thought that Cowlishaw was
>> sufficient; we probably should write some base-level docs that explain
>> the Python mechanisms and refer to Cowlishaw for detail
