Thanks!
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 8:29 PM Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 8 July 2018 at 12:48, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Should we update some PEPs with the new status? E.g. PEP 484.
>
> Aye, 3 PEPs were given the new status as part of the commit:
>
> - 484 (type hinting syntax)
> - 518 (pyproject.to
On 8 July 2018 at 12:48, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Should we update some PEPs with the new status? E.g. PEP 484.
Aye, 3 PEPs were given the new status as part of the commit:
- 484 (type hinting syntax)
- 518 (pyproject.toml/[build-system].requires)
- 517 (pyproject.toml/[build-system].backend)
Should we update some PEPs with the new status? E.g. PEP 484.
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 7:46 PM Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> After review from Barry & Guido, I've just merged an update to PEP 1
> and the PEP index generator that separates out provisionally accepted
> PEPs to their own state
