On Thursday 29 March 2007 17:48, Collin Winter wrote:
> The docs for atexit in py3k [1] are mostly (though not all) in
> italics; I can't figure out why, and I'd appreciate if anyone with
> stronger latex-foo could take a look.
This is now fixed in Py3K, and there are no further occurrances of
On 3/29/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Collin Winter schrieb:
> > The docs for atexit in py3k [1] are mostly (though not all) in
> > italics; I can't figure out why, and I'd appreciate if anyone with
> > stronger latex-foo could take a look.
>
> This is still the same error as in th
Collin Winter schrieb:
> On 3/29/07, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thursday 08 March 2007 08:42, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> > Certainly not. In today's copy (8.3.07, 13:30 GMT), this starts
>> > between 18.17 and 18.17.1. However, looking at the tex, I cannot
>> > find anyth
On 3/29/07, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 08 March 2007 08:42, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> > Certainly not. In today's copy (8.3.07, 13:30 GMT), this starts
> > between 18.17 and 18.17.1. However, looking at the tex, I cannot
> > find anything suspicious. texcheck comp
On Thursday 08 March 2007 08:42, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Certainly not. In today's copy (8.3.07, 13:30 GMT), this starts
> between 18.17 and 18.17.1. However, looking at the tex, I cannot
> find anything suspicious. texcheck complains about a missing ),
> which I added, but it only was a probl
BJörn Lindqvist schrieb:
> (This might be a silly question..)
>
> In the dev stdlib reference there are lots of pages in which all text
> is in italics. Such as all chapters after chapter 18.
Certainly not. In today's copy (8.3.07, 13:30 GMT), this starts
between 18.17 and 18.17.1. However, look
