On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Nick Stinemates wrote:
> This is really great to hear and something I would be hugely interested in
> contributing to.
> Lurking has paid off :)
> Nick
>
Once I get the machine in place, and the team engaged, I am sure
they'll be looking for help. As it stands, th
This is really great to hear and something I would be hugely interested in
contributing to.
Lurking has paid off :)
Nick
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
> wrote:
> > PyPy maintains http://speed.pypy.org/, which prov
Hi Nick, Jesse,
Thanks both for your responses, it's much appreciated! It's very useful to
have a clear pointer to the right place to begin looking.
Regards,
-Tennessee
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
> wrote:
>> PyPy maintains http://speed.pypy.org/, which provides very clear information
>> about the relative performance of PyPy trunk against some version of cpython
>> (presumably 2.6
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
wrote:
> PyPy maintains http://speed.pypy.org/, which provides very clear information
> about the relative performance of PyPy trunk against some version of cpython
> (presumably 2.6 or 2.7). I'm not aware of a similar site for cpython, but
>
