On Monday 24 October 2005 7:39 pm, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 10/24/05, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > > A concern I'd have with fixing this is that Unicode objects also
> > > support the buffer API. In any situation where either str or unicode
> > > is a
On Monday 24 October 2005 7:39 pm, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 10/24/05, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > > A concern I'd have with fixing this is that Unicode objects also
> > > support the buffer API. In any situation where either str or unicode
> > > is a
On 10/24/05, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > A concern I'd have with fixing this is that Unicode objects also
> > support the buffer API. In any situation where either str or unicode
> > is accepted I'd be reluctant to guess whether a buffer object was
> > mea
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 10/24/05, Phil Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I'm implementing a string-like object in an extension module and trying to
>>make it as interoperable with the standard string object as possible. To do
>>this I'm implementing the relevant slots and the buffer int
On 10/24/05, Phil Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm implementing a string-like object in an extension module and trying to
> make it as interoperable with the standard string object as possible. To do
> this I'm implementing the relevant slots and the buffer interface. For most
> things thi
