On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 9:02 PM Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
>
> On 6/30/18 4:20 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> > Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >> I am asking if there's a way we can discourage the use of
> >> "signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL)" unless the user really understands what
> >> they are doing.
> >
> > Maybe
On 6/30/18 4:20 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I am asking if there's a way we can discourage the use of
"signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL)" unless the user really understands what
they are doing.
Maybe there's some way that SIGPIPEs on stdout could be handled
differently by default,
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I am asking if there's a way we can discourage the use
of "signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL)" unless the user really understands what
they are doing.
Maybe there's some way that SIGPIPEs on stdout could be handled
differently by default, so that they exit silently instead of
pro
