Thomas Wouters wrote:
> Although I've made it look like I have a working implementation, I haven't.
> I know exactly how to do it, though, except for the AST part ;) Once I
> figure out how to properly work with the AST code I'll probably write this
> patch whether it's a definite 'no' or not, just
On 2/15/06, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been thinking about generalization of the *args/**kwargs syntax for
> quite a while, and even though I'm pretty sure Guido (and many people) will
> consider it overgeneralization, I am finally going to suggest it. This whole
> idea is not
> I've been thinking about generalization of the *args/**kwargs syntax for
> quite a while, and even though I'm pretty sure Guido (and many people) will
> consider it overgeneralization, I am finally going to suggest it. This whole
> idea is not something dear to my heart, although I obviously woul
