Christoph Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do not claim the 2 TUs test will cover all possible scenarios. I am not even
> sure this decision should be left to an automated test. Because if the test
> breaks for some reason then the user is left with a linker error that is
> time-consuming to
Christoph Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --with-cxx=: If you plan to use C++ extension modules, then on some
> platform you need to compile python's main() function with the C++
> compiler. With this option, make will use to compile main()
> *and* to link the python
David Abrahams wrote:
>>I'll describe it once more: *If* a program is compiled with the C++
>>compiler, is it *then* possible to still link it with the C compiler?
>>This is the question this test tries to answer.
>
>
> Okay, I understand that. What I have never understood is why that
> should b
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>>>When I looked into this problem I saw that configure in fact builds a test
>>>executable that included an object file compiled with g++. If the link step
>>>with gcc succeeds then LINKCC is set as above, otherwise CXX is
>>>u
David Abrahams wrote:
>>When I looked into this problem I saw that configure in fact builds a test
>>executable that included an object file compiled with g++. If the link step
>>with gcc succeeds then LINKCC is set as above, otherwise CXX is
>>used. Obviously, on my system this test was successful
[Christoph, please keep the python-dev list in the loop here, at least
until they get annoyed and decide we're off-topic. I think this is
crucial to the way they package and deliver Python]
Christoph Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:27:46PM -0400, David Abrahams w
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> I'm wondering if there has been a well-known recent change either in Python
>> or GCC that would account for these new reports. Any relevant
>> information would be appreciated.
>
> So what about the theory that it may be th
David Abrahams wrote:
> I'm wondering if there has been a well-known recent change either in Python
> or GCC that would account for these new reports. Any relevant
> information would be appreciated.
So what about the theory that it may be that different versions of
libstdc++ get linked? Python i
