On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:44:04 am DrKJam wrote:
> IPv6 doesn't support the notion of a broadcast address as part of a
> CIDR network block at all. AFAIK, it is a perfect legitimate for the
> last address in an IPv6 block to be used to configure a network
> interface. The IPv6 network object interfac
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 at 15:44, DrKJam wrote:
Granted, there are decisions to be made about exactly what the
properties/methods should be named to avoid ambiguity, but they are
important enough to be given access to in their own right. Details in
docstrings help too ;-) 'network' and 'broadcast' ar
DrKJam gmail.com> writes:
>
> BTW, has anyone considered use of the term *CIDR to refer to an address + mask
object?
This sounds too obscure for a non-specialist.
> Obviously we'd still have the issue of what to do with the host bits to the
right of the supplied mask (keep or discard). This is
