On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a while back there was a discussion about new operators for the language,
> which
> ended in people mentioning that the status of PEP 225 was still undecided and
> that it was the most likely route to consider in this dis
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> a while back there was a discussion about new operators for the language,
> which
> ended in people mentioning that the status of PEP 225 was still undecided and
> that it was the most likely route to consider
