On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -On [20080226 08:09], Neal Norwitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >I agree with the theory. However, we have only a single BSD box
> >currently working and it has been flaky. Primarily test_smtplib has
>
-On [20080226 08:09], Neal Norwitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I agree with the theory. However, we have only a single BSD box
>currently working and it has been flaky. Primarily test_smtplib has
>been failing sporadically on it. For example:
What are the requirements for a build box? I have bo
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -On [20080226 06:05], Neal Norwitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > sparc solaris10
> > amd64 gentoo (this is really an ubuntu 6.10 box)
> > x86 gentoo (*)
> > g4 os x (this one has svn problems from
-On [20080226 06:05], Neal Norwitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> sparc solaris10
> amd64 gentoo (this is really an ubuntu 6.10 box)
> x86 gentoo (*)
> g4 os x (this one has svn problems from time to time which is odd
>given that it is the only box colocated with the svn server)
> some win xp bo
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's a really good idea. At least for the alpha's I would like to
> have a policy that the monthly release goes out unless
>
> 1) There are critical bugs open for 2.6 and/or 3.0
> 2) The important buildbots are red
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 24, 2008, at 10:06 PM, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:52 PM, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yesterday's bug day was another success, closing 48 issues. Several
>> committers were there: Facundo Bastista, Georg Bra
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 07:06:42PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> I'd rather push it out to mid-month assuming Barry starts releasing
> alphas at the end of each month. That should provide some time to
> stabalize. Any one see the buildbots recently? :-(
> http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/
I
2008/2/25, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Should we have one next month? The PyCon sprint will fall on Monday
> through Thursday, and few people not at PyCon will be available during
> the work week. OTOH, if we scheduled a bug day for the 29th, that's
> two weeks after the conference,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:52 PM, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yesterday's bug day was another success, closing 48 issues. Several
> committers were there: Facundo Bastista, Georg Brandl, and Christian
> Heimes. Facundo organized a local group of participants, and we
> committed a
